phone icon

The Ticket Clinic Has Locations Nationwide

Ticket in another state?
Click Here

Traffic Lawyer Report: Palm Beach County By The Numbers

Read More

Traffic Lawyer Report: Pinellas County By The Numbers

Over the last decade, Pinellas County has seen explosive population growth. It is now the 7th most populated Florida county with 978,872 residents according to the 2020 census.

Read More

Traffic Lawyer Report: Broward County By The Numbers

Over the last decade, Broward County also known as the Fort Lauderdale area has seen explosive population growth. Broward is now the 2nd most populated Florida county with 1,966,120 residents according to the 2020 census. That’s over a 12% increase in total population. All those new people leads to more traffic congestion and ultimately more law [...]

Read More

Traffic Lawyer Report: Orlando Area By The Numbers

Over the last decade, Orange County also known as the Orlando area has seen explosive population growth. Orlando is now the 4th most populated Florida city with 290,520 residents according to the 2020 census.

Read More

Traffic Lawyer Report: Where In Florida You’re Most Likely To Get A Speeding Ticket

Due to COVID19 shut downs and more people working from home, there was considerably less traffic on the roads for a good portion of 2020. However, local law enforcement in many counties were still busy writing tickets! In 2020, there were 548,000 speeding tickets written across the state's 67 counties.

Read More
4 Jun 2016 ADMIN

Recent Wins in July

Orange County
Charge – Racing on a Highway
Result – Case Dismissed
2016 CT ****

Our client was arrested and charged with Racing on a Highway after an Officer with the Apopka Police Department used a Laser speed measuring device to clock him doing 101 mph in a 45 mph zone. The Officer’s report did not mention any other vehicles involved in the race or that any other person was suspected of or arrested for competing in this “race” against our client. Furthermore, there was no indication that our client’s driving pattern could be considered as reckless driving. After presenting our arguments in court to the Judge, the State agreed to dismiss the case against our client.

Orange County
Charge – Reckless Driving
Result – Case Dismissed
2016 CT ****

Our client was charged with Reckless Driving after a police officer allegedly clocked him at 140 mph in a 70 mph zone on I-4 around 3am. In court, the attorney argued the officer failed to show how our client’s alleged high speed driving in the early hours of the morning without more rose to the level of reckless driving. The State argued that the level of the speed alone was enough to prove that our client was in fact driving recklessly as a matter of driving twice the speed limit. We presented arguments to the court that there was no indication in any report or citation that our client’s driving put any other person at risk or in danger and was insufficient to sustain the charge. The Judge asked the State if there was any evidence any other motorists were at risk, and when the State responded that they did not know, the Judge replied, “Well then the Defense’s argument seems to be right, don’t ya think?” The State responded by dismissing the case against our client.

Featured post

Traffic Lawyer Report: Pinellas County By The Numbers
22 Oct 2021 Featured

Traffic Lawyer Report: Pinellas County By The Numbers

Latest post

4 Nov 2021

Traffic Lawyer Report: Palm Beach County By The Numbers

Read more
22 Oct 2021

Traffic Lawyer Report: Pinellas County By The Numbers

Read more
20 Oct 2021

Traffic Lawyer Report: Broward County By The Numbers

Read more
13 Oct 2021

Traffic Lawyer Report: Orlando Area By The Numbers

Read more
6 Oct 2021

Traffic Lawyer Report: Where In Florida You’re Most Likely To Get A Speeding Ticket

Read more

Popular tags

Disclaimer: The information contained on this website and any linked resource is intended to provide general information about legal matters to the public and does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. The content is not guaranteed to be correct, complete, or up-to-date. NO ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. The use of the website does not create an attorney-client relationship. The transmission of information via the website does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and The Ticket Clinic, A Law Firm. Nothing presented on the website constitutes legal advice and shall not be relied upon in any way. Until a signed representation and fee agreement and acceptance of the terms and conditions here and required payment is received and written confirmation from us, there shall be no attorney-client relationship created. No legal advice is being provided. The website is maintained for informational purposes only. Nothing appearing on this site shall be considered legal advice and is presented only as a general statement of the law. Users of the website should not act, or decline to act, based on information or content from this website. The Ticket Clinic, A Law Firm is not liable for the use, or interpretation, of information contained on the website or otherwise presented on accessed through the website, and expressly disclaims all liability for any actions you take or do not take, based on the website's content. *For certain non-moving violations, ask for details. "This disclaimer governs your use of our website; by using our website, you accept this disclaimer in full. If you disagree with any part of this disclaimer, do not use our website. We reserve the right to modify these terms at any time. You should therefore check periodically for changes. By using this site after we post any changes, you agree to accept those changes, whether or not you have reviewed them."